From agent-harness
Conduct a five-axis code review — correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance
How this command is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/agent-harness:reviewcommands/The summary Claude sees in its command listing — used to decide when to auto-load this command
Invoke the agent-harness:code-review-and-quality skill. Review the current changes (staged or recent commits) across all five axes: 1. **Correctness** — Does it match the spec? Edge cases handled? Tests adequate? 2. **Readability** — Clear names? Straightforward logic? Well-organized? 3. **Architecture** — Follows existing patterns? Clean boundaries? Right abstraction level? 4. **Security** — Input validated? Secrets safe? Auth checked? (Use security-and-hardening skill) 5. **Performance** — No N+1 queries? No unbounded ops? (Use performance-optimization skill) Categorize findings as Cri...
Invoke the agent-harness:code-review-and-quality skill.
Review the current changes (staged or recent commits) across all five axes:
Categorize findings as Critical, Important, or Suggestion. Output a structured review with specific file:line references and fix recommendations.
npx claudepluginhub ghosteken/agent-harness --plugin agent-harness/reviewReviews staged changes or recent commits across five axes—correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance—producing categorized findings with file:line references and fixes.
/reviewRuns Codex code review on local git state (working tree or vs base branch). Supports --wait/--background, --base <ref>, --scope auto|working-tree|branch.
/reviewRequests independent peer review of phase plans from multiple external AI CLIs (Gemini, Claude, Codex, etc.) and writes structured feedback to REVIEWS.md.
/reviewRuns an enhanced multi-LLM PR review with inline comments, checking availability of local and API-based providers for cross-model escalation.
/reviewReviews HTML file for design anti-patterns, principles violations, and accessibility issues. Generates markdown report with status tables and recommendations.
/reviewReviews specified code scope via four specialists (quality, security, performance, architecture), producing summary, detailed findings, refactoring suggestions, prioritized action plan.