Software Engineering Chain-of-Verification - verify code, architecture, and bug fixes through factored multi-agent verification
npx claudepluginhub vertti/se-cove-claude-pluginVerify code, architecture, and bug fixes through factored multi-agent verification
A Claude Code plugin that catches bugs in AI-generated code by verifying against requirements, not implementation.
When you ask an AI to review its own code, it's biased toward its solution. Meta's Chain-of-Verification research showed that independent verification improves accuracy by 28% - because the verifier checks against requirements, not the (possibly flawed) implementation.
SE-CoVe applies this to code: the verifier never sees the draft solution. It answers verification questions by checking docs, searching your codebase, and reasoning about requirements - then a synthesizer compares findings and corrects errors.
Unlike general-purpose verification, SE-CoVe is designed specifically for code. Each agent understands 35+ software engineering claim categories across three domains:
Behaviors, logic flow, boundary conditions, error handling, API usage patterns
Input validation, authentication, authorization, injection prevention, data exposure
Time/space complexity, caching, memory management, async patterns, N+1 queries
The verification pipeline includes:
Question → Baseline (generate + extract claims)
↓
Planner (create verification tasks)
↓
Executor (verify independently - never sees draft)
↓
Synthesizer (compare + correct)
↓
Verified Solution
First add the marketplace
/plugin marketplace add vertti/se-cove-claude-plugin
then install the plugin
/plugin install chain-of-verification
/chain-of-verification:verify <your question>
Tip: Type /ver and press Tab to autocomplete the command.
| Flag | Short | Description |
|---|---|---|
--quick | -q | Fast verification (haiku models, 1 executor) |
--thorough | -t | Comprehensive verification (opus models, 4+ parallel executors) |
--focus=X | -f X | Prioritize a specific area (see below) |
| Focus | What It Checks |
|---|---|
security | Auth, input validation, injection, data exposure |
performance | Complexity, caching, memory, N+1 queries |
api | Contracts, versioning, error responses, compatibility |
testing | Coverage, edge cases, integration, mocks |
error-handling | Exceptions, recovery, logging, user feedback |
style | Naming, organization, documentation, types |
scalability | Bottlenecks, resource limits, horizontal scaling |
# Standard verification (default)
/chain-of-verification:verify How do I implement debounced search in React?
# Quick sanity check
/chain-of-verification:verify --quick Is this null check correct?
# Thorough security review (4 parallel executors)
/chain-of-verification:verify --thorough --focus=security Review the authentication flow
# API-focused verification
/chain-of-verification:verify -f api Does this endpoint handle errors correctly?
# Test coverage analysis
/chain-of-verification:verify --focus=testing Are these unit tests comprehensive?
# Error handling review
/chain-of-verification:verify -f error-handling How should this handle failures?
Good for: Complex code generation, architectural decisions, bug investigations, library/API questions
Skip for: Trivial changes, simple questions, exploratory coding
Based on Meta's Chain-of-Verification research, which demonstrated 28% improvement in factual accuracy through independent verification.
MIT
Lazy senior dev mode for AI agents. The best code is the code you never wrote.
Claude Code marketplace entries for the plugin-safe Antigravity Awesome Skills library and its compatible editorial bundles.
Production-ready workflow orchestration with 84 marketplace plugins, 192 local specialized agents, and 156 local skills - optimized for granular installation and minimal token usage