golang-skills

Use when defining or implementing Go interfaces, designing abstractions, creating mockable boundaries for testing, or composing types through embedding. Also use when deciding whether to accept an interface or return a concrete type, or using type assertions or type switches, even if the user doesn't explicitly mention interfaces. Does not cover generics-based polymorphism (see go-generics).

Use when setting up linting for a Go project, configuring golangci-lint, or adding Go checks to a CI/CD pipeline. Also use when starting a new Go project and deciding which linters to enable, even if the user only asks about "code quality" or "static analysis" without mentioning specific linter names. Does not cover code review process (see go-code-review).

Use when choosing a logging approach, configuring slog, writing structured log statements, or deciding log levels in Go. Also use when setting up production logging, adding request-scoped context to logs, or migrating from log to slog, even if the user doesn't explicitly mention logging. Does not cover error handling strategy (see go-error-handling).

Use when naming any Go identifier — packages, types, functions, methods, variables, constants, or receivers — to ensure idiomatic, clear names. Also use when a user is creating new types, packages, or exported APIs, even if they don't explicitly ask about naming conventions. Does not cover package organization (see go-packages).

Use when creating Go packages, organizing imports, managing dependencies, or deciding how to structure Go code into packages. Also use when starting a new Go project or splitting a growing codebase into packages, even if the user doesn't explicitly ask about package organization. Does not cover naming individual identifiers (see go-naming).