bettercallclaude

Check MCP server connectivity

Run three-agent adversarial analysis -- advocate builds the case, adversary challenges it, judicial analyst synthesizes

Structured pre-execution briefing session -- collects case context through specialist panel, builds execution plan, supports resume and depth control

Analyze cantonal law for all 26 Swiss cantons -- cantonal court decisions, cantonal legislation, procedural specifics, and interaction with federal law

Validate, format, and look up Swiss legal citations including BGE/ATF/DTF decisions and statutory references

Challenges a legal position by finding weaknesses, counter-precedents, and opposing arguments under Swiss law

Builds the strongest possible case in favor of a legal position using Swiss law precedents, statutory provisions, and doctrine

Pre-execution briefing session that collects case context through multi-agent panel consultation, builds a structured execution plan, and persists state for cross-session recovery

Analyzes law across all 26 Swiss cantons including cantonal constitutions, court systems, intercantonal concordats, procedural variations, and multi-canton comparisons

Verifies, formats, and converts Swiss legal citations across BGE/ATF/DTF, cantonal decisions, and statutory references in DE/FR/IT

Swiss adversarial legal analysis — stress-tests any legal position by running three independent agents: Advocate (strongest case FOR), Adversary (strongest case AGAINST), and Judicial synthesizer (Erwägung-style balanced conclusion with probability). Trigger when: a user wants to stress-test a legal position, check for weaknesses before filing, validate that an analysis is not one-sided, or explicitly requests adversarial review. Also triggered as option '4' in the /legal post-execution framework menu. Invoked via /bettercallclaude:adversarial. Do NOT trigger for: initial research (use swiss-legal-research), strategy advice (use swiss-legal-strategy), or document drafting — adversarial analysis is a quality/stress-test layer, not a first-pass analysis tool.

Swiss financial regulatory compliance analysis — assesses and maps compliance obligations under FINMA supervision, GwG/LBA (AML/KYC), FIDLEG/LSFin (financial services), FINIG/LEFin (financial institution licensing), BankG (banking secrecy), crypto/DLT regulation (DLT-Gesetz / Mantelerlass amending OR/FinfraG/BankG/GwG, FINMA ICO/staking guidance), nDSG data processing in fintech, and cross-border obligations (AEOI/CRS, FATCA/QI, EU market access). Trigger when: a user asks 'do we need a FINMA license', 'are we compliant with GwG/AML', 'what are the KYC requirements', 'can we offer financial services cross-border', 'what does FINMA require for crypto/DLT/tokens', 'is our data processing compliant for fintech'; or when the compliance-officer agent is invoked. Also use for FINIG licensing gap analysis and remediation planning. Do NOT trigger for: general corporate law questions (use corporate-law-agent); data protection not specific to financial services (use data-protection-specialist); tax/transfer-pricing (use fiscal-legal-expert); cantonal commercial registry or zoning (use cantonal skill).

Swiss data protection law analysis — applies the nDSG/FADP framework (in force 1.9.2023), assesses GDPR adequacy interplay, maps cantonal data protection laws (IDG/KDSG/LIPAD), conducts DSFAs/DPIAs, and evaluates cross-border transfer mechanisms (adequacy, SCCs, BCRs, TIA). Trigger when: a user asks 'are we nDSG/GDPR compliant', 'do we need a data processing agreement', 'can we transfer data to [country]', 'do we need a DPIA/DSFA', 'what data protection obligations apply to us', 'is our privacy policy compliant', 'what rights do data subjects have under Swiss law', or references FDPIC, nDSG, DSG, FADP, or cantonal DP laws. Also triggered when the data-protection agent is invoked. Do NOT trigger for: financial regulatory data processing in fintech (use compliance-frameworks alongside this skill); document analysis tasks (use swiss-document-analysis); attorney-client privilege routing (use privacy-routing skill first); general corporate compliance not involving personal data (use corporate-law-agent).

BetterCallClaude 5-step Swiss legal framework — an end-to-end pipeline that chains five agents sequentially: (1) doc-analyze for intake and fact extraction, (2) swiss-legal-research for precedent and statute lookup via BGE/ATF/DTF, fedlex-sparql, entscheidsuche, and onlinekommentar MCP servers, (3) swiss-legal-strategy for claim strength, risk matrix, and settlement evaluation, (4) adversarial-analysis for three-agent Erwägung-style stress test, (5) swiss-legal-drafting for verified document production. Trigger when: a user invokes /bettercallclaude:legal-5step, asks to run the full framework on a case, wants a complete legal analysis from intake to draft, or says 'run all steps', 'full pipeline', 'end-to-end analysis', or 'complete legal workflow'. Do NOT trigger for: single-step tasks (use the individual command: research, strategy, adversarial, draft, or doc-analyze), citation-only work (use swiss-citation-formats), quick legal questions (use swiss-legal-research directly), or translation only (use swiss-legal-translation). Boundary with /bettercallclaude:workflow: the workflow command executes predefined pipelines (litigation-prep, due-diligence, etc.); legal-5step is a fixed five-step framework that always runs the same sequence and is optimized for repeatable client intake.

Proactively suggests or activates a structured briefing session before executing complex Swiss legal queries. Trigger whenever a query: spans multiple legal domains (corporate + tax, employment + social insurance, regulatory + M&A), is multi-jurisdictional (federal + cantonal, Swiss + German/EU), involves both analysis and a deliverable document, mentions financial exposure above CHF 100,000, uses open-ended or uncertain language ('handle', 'deal with', 'advise on', 'figure out', 'not sure how to', 'where do we even start', 'what are my options'), or requires coordinating three or more specialist agents. Activate for: group restructuring, IPO preparation, cross-border M&A, family office setup, FINMA/crypto/AML compliance, shareholder disputes with board deadlock, employment termination with discrimination claims, tenancy disputes spanning cantonal and federal law, startup entity conversions, and any situation where the user cannot identify a single focused legal question. Do NOT trigger for: single-article lookups, citation checks, translation-only requests, single-canton procedural questions, or clearly scoped single-domain questions even if complex.

1 hook across 1 event