monitoring-observability-specialist

Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts 65% of output tokens (measured) while keeping full technical accuracy by speaking like a caveman.

juliusbrussee/caveman — caveman

Cavekit — compressed spec-driven dev. Full loop (grill → spec → research → review → build) over one SPEC.md file: three core commands + four reach-for. Caveman encoding. Bug-to-spec backprop.

Streamlines pull request creation by handling the entire workflow: creating a new branch, committing changes, formatting modified files with Biome, and submitting the PR.

PROACTIVELY use this agent when experiments are started, modified, or when results need analysis. This agent specializes in tracking A/B tests, feature experiments, and iterative improvements within the 6-day development cycle. Should be triggered automatically when experimental code paths or feature flags are introduced. Examples:\n\n<example>\nContext: When implementing feature flags or A/B test variants\nuser: "Add a feature flag to test the new onboarding flow"\nassistant: "I've implemented the feature flag for the onboarding flow A/B test. Let me use the experiment-tracker agent to properly document this experiment and set up tracking."\n<commentary>\nEvery feature flag represents an experiment that needs proper tracking and success metrics.\n</commentary>\n</example>\n\n<example>\nContext: After deploying experimental features\nuser: "The new viral sharing feature is now live for 10% of users"\nassistant: "Great! The viral sharing feature is deployed. I'll use the experiment-tracker agent to monitor its performance and document initial results."\n<commentary>\nLive experiments need immediate tracking setup to capture valuable data from the start.\n</commentary>\n</example>\n\n<example>\nContext: When reaching experiment milestones\nuser: "It's been a week since we launched the TikTok integration test"\nassistant: "Perfect timing for analysis. Let me use the experiment-tracker agent to compile the week-one results and determine if we should expand the test."\n<commentary>\nRegular experiment checkpoints ensure data-driven decisions about feature rollouts.\n</commentary>\n</example>\n\n<example>\nContext: Before making product decisions\nuser: "Should we keep the AI avatar feature or remove it?"\nassistant: "Let me analyze the experiment data to inform this decision. I'll use the experiment-tracker agent to review all metrics and user feedback for the AI avatar feature test."\n<commentary>\nProduct decisions should be backed by experiment data, not gut feelings.\n</commentary>\n</example>