By MaxGhenis
Simulate academic peer review with journal-matched referee personas. Find suitable journals, generate domain-expert reviewers, run parallel reviews, iterate until acceptance.
Find suitable open access journals for your paper/software
Generate referee personas matched to a target journal
Full iterative review cycle - find journal, generate referees, review, iterate until accept
Run all referee reviews in parallel
Application domain specialist reviewing relevance and context
Technical methods expert reviewing mathematical/statistical rigor
Reviews papers for policy neutrality, checking that claims stay within model scope and avoiding advocacy or speculative language
End-user perspective reviewer focusing on usability and practical value
Always-included referee focused on code quality, documentation, and replication
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
A collection of Claude Code plugins for research, policy analysis, and development.
/plugin marketplace add MaxGhenis/claude-plugins
Then install individual plugins:
/plugin install academic-referee@maxghenis-plugins
Multi-perspective academic paper review with journal-matched referee personas.
Simulates the peer review process to help improve your research before submission.
Find a journal: /find-journal [topic]
Generate referees: /generate-referees <journal>
Run reviews: /run-review [referees]
Full cycle: /review-cycle [journal]
| Referee | Focus |
|---|---|
| Methodology | Mathematical rigor, statistical validity, algorithmic correctness |
| Domain Expert | Application relevance, related work, field context |
| Practitioner | Usability, documentation, practical value |
| Reproducibility | Code quality, tests, documentation, replication |
# Start the full review cycle
/review-cycle
# Or step by step:
/find-journal "differentially private econometrics"
/generate-referees "Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality"
/run-review
Add new plugins to plugins/ directory:
plugins/
└── my-new-plugin/
├── plugin.json
├── commands/
├── agents/
└── skills/
Then add to .claude-plugin/marketplace.json.
MIT
Max Ghenis ([email protected])
npx claudepluginhub maxghenis/claude-plugins --plugin academic-refereeForecasting as a harness - reframe decisions as KPI predictions
Book writing plugin for Society in Silico - factchecking, style editing, and manuscript management
论文评审 — 5 人评审团队 + EIC:方法学、领域、统计、批判性、视角多维度审稿
Manage your academic publication pipeline from Claude Code — list, search, create, move, analyse, export BibTeX, track reminders, and sync papers (GitHub + Overleaf) via the Kabbo MCP server.
Simulate peer review by constructing reviewer personas from Zotero sources. Identifies relevant perspectives, retrieves full texts, builds reviewer profiles, and generates focused reviews on theory/methods and findings.
Production-grade academic research pipeline for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize. 4 skills, 27 modes, 39-agent ensemble, v3.7.3 + v3.8 L3 claim-faithfulness gate, v3.9.0 cross-index triangulation, v3.10 triangulation policy layer, v3.11 deterministic citation verification gate (#182).
Multi-agent orchestrator for academic writing: 12 specialist agents and 30 writing principles for review, research, drafting, polishing, bibliography auditing, and literature surveys.
Academic manuscript toolkit: peer review, manuscript writing, and journal-specific formatting for submission