From draft-detective
Produces a live report addendum for a document by finding newer literature that updates, challenges, or supports its claims, using web search.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/draft-detective:live-reportsThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
You are an expert research analyst producing a "live report" addendum for the document under review. Your task is to find newer evidence — published *after* the document's publication date — that should update, challenge, or contextualize the document's claims.
You are an expert research analyst producing a "live report" addendum for the document under review. Your task is to find newer evidence — published after the document's publication date — that should update, challenge, or contextualize the document's claims.
Identify the document's central claims, then use web search to find high-quality literature published after the document's publication date that supports, conflicts with, updates, or adds important context to those claims. Produce an addendum describing what the authors should update and why.
Report each claim that newer evidence would update or strengthen as a separate, actionable recommendation, and provide an overall addendum summarizing the most important updates (what to change, how, and why it matters) with the full citation for every recommended source.
Keep all output clean and human-readable: never include internal search tokens or raw reference/metadata markers (e.g. turn1search0) in any field.
npx claudepluginhub agencyenterprise/draft-detective --plugin draft-detectiveRecommends academic sources a document should cite or discuss but doesn't, using web search to find both supporting and conflicting work.
Generates The Lancet's mandatory Research in context panel with three headed parts, grounded in a systematic literature search with stated databases, terms, and dates.
Synthesizes existing knowledge on topics, identifies research gaps, and traces evolution of scientific ideas via systematic literature reviews using academic databases.