From incident-runbook
Incident response runbooks, on-call workflows, and postmortem templates. Generates severity-tiered runbooks, communication templates, timeline reconstruction, and blameless postmortem docs. Use when user is in an incident, doing on-call prep, writing a postmortem, or building incident response playbooks.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/incident-runbook:incident-runbookThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Structured incident response — from first alert to blameless postmortem.
Structured incident response — from first alert to blameless postmortem.
/incident-runbook new <service> — create runbook for a service
/incident-runbook triage — immediate triage checklist
/incident-runbook postmortem — generate postmortem from timeline
/incident-runbook comms — draft stakeholder communication
/incident-runbook playbook <error> — generate playbook for specific error type
| Sev | Criteria | Response Time | Who |
|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | Prod down, data loss, security breach | 5 min | IC + Eng lead + CTO |
| P1 | Core feature degraded, >10% users affected | 15 min | IC + On-call |
| P2 | Non-critical feature degraded, workaround exists | 1 hour | On-call |
| P3 | Minor issue, low user impact | Next business day | Team |
[ ] 1. Acknowledge alert (prevents duplicate paging)
[ ] 2. Assess severity → declare P0/P1/P2/P3
[ ] 3. P0/P1: Open incident Slack channel #inc-YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>
[ ] 4. Assign Incident Commander (IC) — single decision owner
[ ] 5. Start timeline doc (incident log)
[ ] 6. Notify stakeholders (template below)
[ ] 7. Do NOT start fixing until you understand the blast radius
🔴 INCIDENT DECLARED — P[0/1]
Service: [service name]
Impact: [what users can't do]
Status: Investigating
IC: @[name]
Channel: #inc-[slug]
Next update: in 15 min
🟡 INCIDENT UPDATE — P[0/1] — [HH:MM]
Status: [Investigating / Identified / Fixing / Monitoring]
Impact: [current user impact]
Root cause hypothesis: [best theory]
Actions taken: [what you did]
Next update: in [X] min
✅ INCIDENT RESOLVED — P[0/1] — [HH:MM]
Duration: [X hours Y min]
Impact: [X users affected, Y% of traffic]
Root cause: [brief]
Fix applied: [what was done]
Postmortem: [link] — due [date]
TRIAGE — [service] — [timestamp]
=====================================
[ ] Is the service responding? (curl / health endpoint)
[ ] Is it all users or a subset? (region / customer / feature)
[ ] When did it start? (check deploy history, cron jobs, traffic spike)
[ ] What changed recently? (git log, infra changes, dependency updates)
[ ] Is the database healthy? (query time, connections, replication lag)
[ ] Is a dependency degraded? (check status pages, upstream errors)
[ ] Are error rates spiking or flat-lining?
[ ] Is it a traffic spike or a code regression?
# Runbook: [Service Name]
## Contacts
- On-call: @[team-pagerduty-rotation]
- Escalation: @[eng-lead] → @[cto]
- External: [vendor support link]
## Dashboards
- [Grafana link]
- [Datadog link]
- [Log query link]
## Common Alerts and Fixes
### Alert: High Error Rate (>1%)
1. Check recent deploys: `git log --since="2 hours ago"`
2. Check DB: `SELECT * FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE state='active'`
3. Rollback if code change: `kubectl rollout undo deploy/[service]`
### Alert: High Latency (p99 > 1s)
1. Check DB slow queries
2. Check Redis hit rate
3. Check external API timeouts
### Rollback Procedure
```bash
# Kubernetes
kubectl rollout undo deployment/[service]
kubectl rollout status deployment/[service]
# Vercel
vercel rollback [deployment-url]
# Railway / Render
# Use dashboard instant rollback button
## Blameless Postmortem Template
```markdown
# Postmortem: [Incident Title]
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD | **Severity:** P[0/1] | **Duration:** Xh Ymin
**Authors:** @[names] | **Review date:** [date + 7 days]
## Summary
[2–3 sentence description of what happened, impact, and resolution]
## Impact
- Users affected: ~X (Y% of total)
- Duration: HH:MM–HH:MM UTC
- Revenue impact: $X (if applicable)
## Timeline (UTC)
| Time | Event |
|------|-------|
| 14:32 | Alert fired: error rate >5% |
| 14:35 | On-call acknowledged |
| 14:41 | Identified bad deploy at 14:20 |
| 14:45 | Rollback initiated |
| 14:52 | Error rate normalized |
| 15:10 | Declared resolved |
## Root Cause
[Technical root cause. What failed and why.]
## Contributing Factors
- [Factor 1: e.g., no canary deployment]
- [Factor 2: e.g., alert threshold too high]
## What Went Well
- [e.g., fast detection via synthetic monitoring]
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|--------|-------|-----|
| Add canary deploy step to CI | @dev | 2026-06-21 |
| Lower error rate alert to 0.5% | @ops | 2026-06-17 |
npx claudepluginhub andersonlimahw/lemon-ai-hub --plugin incident-runbookCreates incident response runbooks with severity levels, detection triggers, communication steps, and mitigations like Kubernetes rollbacks and scaling via kubectl/bash.
Creates structured incident response runbooks with severity levels, escalation paths, and recovery procedures for production outages and database incidents.
Generates structured incident runbooks with diagnostic steps, resolution procedures, escalation paths, and communication templates. Useful for standardizing response processes, reducing MTTR, and documenting recurring alert procedures.