From legal
Runs compliance checks on product features, initiatives, or actions touching personal data, surfacing regulations like GDPR, approvals, risks, and mitigations.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/legal:compliance-check <action or initiative to check><action or initiative to check>The summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
> If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md).
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Run a compliance check on a proposed action, product feature, marketing campaign, or business initiative.
Important: This command assists with legal workflows but does not provide legal advice. Compliance assessments should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals. Regulatory requirements change frequently; always verify current requirements with authoritative sources.
/compliance-check $ARGUMENTS
Describe what you're planning to do. Examples:
## Compliance Check: [Initiative]
### Summary
[Quick assessment: Proceed / Proceed with conditions / Requires further review]
### Applicable Regulations and Policies
| Regulation/Policy | Relevance | Key Requirements |
|-------------------|-----------|-----------------|
| [GDPR / CCPA / HIPAA / etc.] | [How it applies] | [What you need to do] |
### Requirements
| # | Requirement | Status | Action Needed |
|---|-------------|--------|---------------|
| 1 | [Requirement] | [Met / Not Met / Unknown] | [What to do] |
### Risk Areas
| Risk | Severity | Mitigation |
|------|----------|------------|
| [Risk] | [High/Med/Low] | [How to address] |
### Recommended Actions
1. [Most important action]
2. [Second priority]
3. [Third priority]
### Approvals Needed
| Approver | Why | Status |
|----------|-----|--------|
| [Person/Team] | [Reason] | [Pending] |
### Further Review Recommended
[Areas where outside counsel or specialist review is advised]
Scope: Applies to processing of personal data of individuals in the EU/EEA, regardless of where the processing organization is located.
Key Obligations for In-House Legal Teams:
Common In-House Legal Touchpoints:
Scope: Applies to businesses that collect personal information of California residents and meet revenue, data volume, or data sale thresholds.
Key Obligations:
Response Timelines:
| Regulation | Jurisdiction | Key Differentiators |
|---|---|---|
| LGPD (Brazil) | Brazil | Similar to GDPR; requires DPO appointment; National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) enforcement |
| POPIA (South Africa) | South Africa | Information Regulator oversight; required registration of processing |
| PIPEDA (Canada) | Canada (federal) | Consent-based framework; OPC oversight; being modernized |
| PDPA (Singapore) | Singapore | Do Not Call registry; mandatory breach notification; PDPC enforcement |
| Privacy Act (Australia) | Australia | Australian Privacy Principles (APPs); notifiable data breaches scheme |
| PIPL (China) | China | Strict cross-border transfer rules; data localization requirements; CAC oversight |
| UK GDPR | United Kingdom | Post-Brexit UK version; ICO oversight; similar to EU GDPR with UK-specific adequacy |
When reviewing a Data Processing Agreement or Data Processing Addendum, verify the following:
| Issue | Risk | Standard Position |
|---|---|---|
| Blanket sub-processor authorization without notification | Loss of control over processing chain | Require notification with right to object |
| Breach notification timeline > 72 hours | May prevent timely regulatory notification | Require notification within 24-48 hours |
| No audit rights (or audit rights only via third-party reports) | Cannot verify compliance | Accept SOC 2 Type II + right to audit upon cause |
| Data deletion timeline not specified | Data retained indefinitely | Require deletion within 30-90 days of termination |
| No data processing locations specified | Data could be processed anywhere | Require disclosure of processing locations |
| Outdated SCCs | Invalid transfer mechanism | Require current EU SCCs (2021 version) |
When a data subject request is received:
Identify the request type:
Identify applicable regulation(s):
Verify identity:
Log the request:
| Regulation | Initial Acknowledgment | Substantive Response | Extension |
|---|---|---|---|
| GDPR | Not specified (best practice: promptly) | 30 days | +60 days (with notice) |
| CCPA/CPRA | 10 business days | 45 calendar days | +45 days (with notice) |
| UK GDPR | Not specified (best practice: promptly) | 30 days | +60 days (with notice) |
| LGPD | Not specified | 15 days | Limited extensions |
Before fulfilling a request, check whether any exemptions apply:
Common exemptions across regulations:
Organization-specific considerations:
Maintain awareness of developments in:
Escalate regulatory developments to senior counsel or leadership when:
npx claudepluginhub anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --plugin legalNavigates GDPR and CCPA privacy regulations, reviews DPAs, and handles data subject requests. Useful for compliance assessments, vendor agreements, cross-border transfers, and DSAR responses.
Assesses an organization's GDPR compliance posture across data processing activities, documentation, and technical controls. Useful for audits, ROPA review, and consent mechanism evaluation.
Reviews a Data Processing Agreement against a DPA playbook, auto-detecting whether you are processor or controller and applying the correct workflow.