From consensus-loop
Guides writing evidence packages for consensus-loop watch file in code reviews. Covers claims, changed files, executable tests, results, risks, tag lifecycles, and rejection fixes.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/consensus-loop:consensus-loopThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
When submitting code changes for consensus review, write a properly structured evidence package in the watch file.
When submitting code changes for consensus review, write a properly structured evidence package in the watch file.
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/config.json first:
consensus.watch_file → submission pathconsensus.trigger_tag / agree_tag / pending_tag → actual tag valuesplugin.respond_file → auditor verdict fileplugin.locale → localeFollow the format defined in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/references/${locale}/evidence-format.md.
Required sections: Claim, Changed Files, Test Command, Test Result, Residual Risk.
Key rules:
[trigger_tag] → auditor reviews → [agree_tag] or [pending_tag]
↓
Fix issues, re-submit with [trigger_tag]
When auditor returns [pending_tag]:
test-gap, claim-drift, scope-mismatch)[trigger_tag] to trigger a new audit cycleFull rejection code reference: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/references/${locale}/rejection-codes.md
npx claudepluginhub berrzebb/claude-plugins --plugin consensus-loopRuns adversarial multi-agent code audits with challenge/verify pipeline. Use for deep quality reviews, not quick PR screening (use /preview for that).
Manually runs consensus-loop audits reviewing pending trigger_tag items in watch files. Use to trigger audits without editing files, re-run failures, test prompts, with dry-run, auto-fix, and model options.
Runs cross-LLM iterative code reviews with Codex or Gemini CLI peers, applying accepted fixes until consensus on improved code and report.