From makerskills
Structured decision-making workflow that triages 38 questions to 6-8 relevant ones, reaches a call, and archives rationale with a revisit date.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/makerskills:decideThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Picks load-bearing questions from the 37signals guide, walks through them, reaches a call, archives the rationale with a revisit date.
Picks load-bearing questions from the 37signals guide, walks through them, reaches a call, archives the rationale with a revisit date.
Get from the user:
If any are missing, ask. Don't proceed with vague framing.
Read references/questions.md for the full 38 and category mapping. Pick 6–8 based on the decision's characteristics:
Default 5 (always ask):
Add based on type:
| If… | Add |
|---|---|
| Reversibility = hard / one-way door | Q14 (is there a wrong decision?), Q17 (knock-on effects), Q34 (principles bent) |
| Time pressure | Q5 (why hesitating?), Q15 (different tomorrow?), Q22 (when do we have to decide?) |
| Multiple people involved | Q21 (someone else's practice rep?), Q27 (would another opinion help?), Q35 (multiple people deciding what one should?) |
| Lots of data / analysis | Q19 (what missing info would change it?), Q26 (data vs gut?), Q9 deepened |
| Recurring decision | Q11 (last time?), Q23 (one-and-done or repeating?) |
| Customer-facing | Q24 (anyone outside depending?), Q25 (customer vs us impact?) |
| Money decision | Q38 (in the end, is this about money?), Q36 (return on effort?) |
| Stuck / not deciding | Q4 (why hasn't it been made already?), Q10 (what if we don't decide?), Q31 (do you even care?) |
Cap at ~8 questions. More than that turns into analysis paralysis (which is itself one of the things this skill exists to prevent).
Tell the user which questions you picked and why, then proceed.
Ask the questions one at a time, or in a tight cluster if the user wants to write fast. Capture their answers verbatim — don't paraphrase into corporate-speak.
For Q9 (first instinct), get the answer BEFORE diving into analysis. The point is to surface the gut call so we can later check if "analysis" was just rationalization.
Synthesize the answers into a decision. Options:
State the call clearly. No hedging.
Pick a revisit date based on when consequences would show up:
Write what to look for on the revisit ("did MRR move? did the partner ship? do clients still ask for X?").
Archives live in ${MAKERSKILLS_CONFIG:-$HOME/.config/makerskills}/decide/archive/ (create the directory if missing). Never write archives inside the skill's own folder — skill installs and upgrades re-sync from source and wipe anything saved there.
Migration: if this skill's folder contains an old references/decisions-archive/ with user entries, move those files into the archive directory before writing anything new.
Write to <archive dir>/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>.md:
# Decision: <one-line>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Decide by:** <date or "open">
**Reversibility:** easy / hard / one-way door
**Stakes:** low / medium / high
## Context
<1–3 sentences>
## Questions
### <Q3 phrasing>
<answer>
### <Q8 phrasing>
<answer>
(only questions actually applied — heading is the question text, not "Q3")
## Decision
**<the call, stated clearly>**
## Rationale
<2–3 sentences synthesizing the answers>
## Expected outcome
<what should be true if this was right, by <date>>
## Revisit
**<YYYY-MM-DD>** — <what to look for>
## Source
Questions adapted from [The 37signals Guide to Making Decisions](https://37signals.com/how-we-make-decisions)
Append to <archive dir>/INDEX.md (create if missing):
- 2026-06-16 — [<decision>](./<filename>.md) — **<call>** — <one-line rationale> — revisit 2026-09-16
Show the archive entry in chat. Tell the user the archive path. Offer:
loop skill to fire at the right time)compound-engineering:schedule)business-brainstorm — brainstorm scores the idea on 9 dimensions; decide formalizes the go/no-go afterbusiness-brainstorm — brainstorm → decide is a natural pipeline for "should I build X"deep-research — when a decision is waiting on info (Q19), trigger research firstfeedback_*.md for principles that might be at play (Q34)loop / compound-engineering:schedule — for revisit remindersnpx claudepluginhub coreyhaines31/makerskills --plugin makerskillsRoutes decision-making requests to the appropriate structured thinking tool: option-mapping, criteria-weighting, premortem-analysis, or reversibility-analysis.
Guides high-stakes decisions like investments, career moves, or purchases through exhaustive discovery, sequential elimination, structured analysis, and research-backed recommendations. Activates on 'help me decide' or 'should I choose'.
Provides structured decision-making by weighing pros and cons, stakeholders, risks, and alternatives. Useful when evaluating options or planning approach.