From compound-engineering
Publishes, reads, comments on, and edits markdown documents in Proof. Use for sharing specs, plans, or drafts via a shareable URL, or for collaborative editing on existing Proof docs.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/compound-engineering:ce-proofThis skill is limited to the following tools:
The summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Proof is a collaborative document editor for humans and agents. It supports two modes:
Proof is a collaborative document editor for humans and agents. It supports two modes:
Every write to a Proof doc must be attributed. Two fields carry the agent's identity:
by on every op, X-Agent-Id header): ai:compound-engineering — stable, lowercase-hyphenated, machine-parseable. Appears in marks, events, and the API response.name on POST /presence): Compound Engineering — human-readable, shown in Proof's presence chips and comment-author badges.Set the display name once per doc session by posting to presence with the X-Agent-Id header; Proof binds the name to that agent ID for the session. These values are the defaults for any caller of this skill; a caller may pass a different identity pair if a distinct sub-agent should own the doc. Do not use ai:compound or other ad-hoc variants — identity stays uniform unless a caller explicitly overrides it.
The primary use is one-way publishing: take an existing local markdown file (a brainstorm, a plan, a learning, a draft), read its full contents and post them as the new doc's body (see "Workflow: Create and Share a New Document" for the source-file recipe — never publish placeholder content), and hand the user a shareable URL. The local file stays canonical — publishing does not sync anything back to disk. The user can open the link to read, comment, and share with others; the agent can also participate via the edit APIs below when given the URL. Two entry points, identical mechanics (see "Workflow: Create and Share a New Document"):
ce-brainstorm, ce-ideate, or ce-plan finishes a draft and hands it off to publish for human review, passing the file path and title explicitly.No authentication required. Returns a shareable URL with access token.
curl -X POST https://www.proofeditor.ai/share/markdown \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"title":"My Doc","markdown":"# Hello\n\nContent here."}'
Response format:
{
"slug": "abc123",
"tokenUrl": "https://www.proofeditor.ai/d/abc123?token=xxx",
"accessToken": "xxx",
"ownerSecret": "yyy",
"_links": {
"state": "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/abc123/state",
"ops": "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/abc123/ops"
}
}
Use the tokenUrl as the shareable link. The _links give you the exact API paths.
If you already have a shared Proof URL, no browser automation is needed. Fetch the URL directly with content negotiation:
curl -s -H "Accept: application/json" "https://www.proofeditor.ai/d/{slug}?token=<token>"
curl -s -H "Accept: text/markdown" "https://www.proofeditor.ai/d/{slug}?token=<token>"
The JSON response includes the markdown, API links, and agent auth hints. Use /state when you need mutation metadata, marks, or presence:
curl -s "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/{slug}/state" \
-H "x-share-token: <token>"
For comment-ingest workflows, prefer the server-side filter:
curl -s "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/{slug}/state?kinds=comment" \
-H "x-share-token: <token>"
state.marks is a union of comments, suggestions, and provenance/authorship marks. The ?kinds=comment filter avoids treating human-authored provenance marks as review comments.
Comment, suggestion, and rewrite operations go to POST https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/{slug}/ops. Block edits use /api/agent/{slug}/edit/v2.
Note: Use the /api/agent/{slug}/ops path (from _links in create response), NOT /api/documents/{slug}/ops.
Authentication for protected docs:
x-share-token: <token> or Authorization: Bearer <token>?token=xxx or the accessToken from create responseX-Agent-Id: ai:compound-engineering (required for presence; include on ops for consistent attribution)Wire-format reminder. /api/agent/{slug}/ops uses a top-level type field; /api/agent/{slug}/edit/v2 uses an operations array where each entry has op. Do not mix — sending op to /ops returns 422.
Every mutation requires a baseToken. Reuse the mutationBase.token from the most recent /state or /snapshot read, then update it from successful mutation responses (.mutationBase.token). On BASE_TOKEN_REQUIRED or STALE_BASE, re-read and retry once. Only do a pre-mutation read if no prior read has happened in this session or you need fresh document/comment/snapshot content.
/edit/v2 block refs are a separate concern: they can drift across revisions, so re-fetch /snapshot for fresh refs before a block edit if any writes have landed since your last snapshot.
Do not default to full-document replacement. Pick the narrowest edit primitive that matches the requested change:
/edit/v2 with find_replace_in_doc (optionally constrained by fromRef, toRef, or block_filter). This is the fastest and least error-prone path for terminology renames, punctuation/style sweeps, and other exact text substitutions./edit/v2 block operations from a fresh /snapshot: replace_block, insert_before, insert_after, delete_block, replace_range, or find_replace_in_block./ops suggestion.add (pending or status: "accepted") when the user should see a suggestion mark and reject/revert affordance for that specific edit.rewrite.apply only as a last resort when the user explicitly asks to replace the entire document, when the intended change is genuinely global and cannot be expressed as block/range/find-replace operations, and when no live clients are present. Before rewriting, read current state, preserve comments/marks expectations, and mention that the rewrite is broad.When in doubt, start with /snapshot and build a small /edit/v2 batch. A narrow failed edit is easier to inspect and retry than a broad rewrite, and it avoids clobbering concurrent human work.
Retry discipline after mutation errors — verify before retrying. An error response is not proof that nothing was written.
STALE_BASE, BASE_TOKEN_REQUIRED, MISSING_BASE, INVALID_BASE_TOKEN — pre-commit, token-related. Re-read /state, rebuild the request body with a fresh baseToken, and retry once with a new Idempotency-Key.ANCHOR_NOT_FOUND, ANCHOR_AMBIGUOUS — pre-commit, but the quote no longer uniquely matches content. Re-reading does not help by itself; the caller must tighten or regenerate the anchor before retrying. Do not auto-retry blindly.INVALID_OPERATIONS, INVALID_REQUEST, INVALID_REF, INVALID_BLOCK_MARKDOWN, INVALID_RANGE, INVALID_MARKDOWN, 422 — pre-commit, but the payload is wrong. Do not retry blindly; fix the payload first.COLLAB_SYNC_FAILED, REWRITE_BARRIER_FAILED, PROJECTION_STALE, INTERNAL_ERROR, 5xx, network timeout, and any 202 with collab.status: "pending" — the canonical doc may have been written even though the call looks like a failure. Before any retry, re-read /state and check whether the intended mark/edit is already present; only retry if it isn't.Idempotency-Key (see below) protects against double-apply on the same request (e.g., TCP-level retry). It does not help if you build a new request body and send a second call — that is a new logical write with a new key.Duplicate-mark incidents usually come from retrying a comment.add or suggestion.add after a timeout without verifying. When in doubt: re-read, diff, then decide.
Idempotency-Key header is recommended on every mutation for safe automation retries; required when /state.contract.idempotencyRequired is true. Use the same key only when resending the exact same serialized request body. If the body changes — including because you replaced baseToken after STALE_BASE — mint a new key or Proof will reject it as key reuse with a different payload.
Comment on text:
{"type": "comment.add", "quote": "text to comment on", "by": "ai:compound-engineering", "text": "Your comment here", "baseToken": "<token>"}
Reply to a comment:
{"type": "comment.reply", "markId": "<id>", "by": "ai:compound-engineering", "text": "Reply text", "baseToken": "<token>"}
Reply and resolve in one mutation:
{"type": "comment.reply", "markId": "<id>", "by": "ai:compound-engineering", "text": "Fixed.", "resolve": true, "baseToken": "<token>"}
Batch existing-thread comment mutations:
{"by": "ai:compound-engineering", "baseToken": "<token>", "operations": [
{"type": "comment.reply", "markId": "<id-1>", "text": "Fixed.", "resolve": true},
{"type": "comment.reply", "markId": "<id-2>", "text": "Leaving this open because X."}
]}
Batch /ops supports comment.reply, comment.resolve, and comment.unresolve for existing threads. Use it to reply to and resolve multiple threads in one call instead of issuing separate reply and resolve requests per thread.
Resolve / unresolve a comment:
{"type": "comment.resolve", "markId": "<id>", "by": "ai:compound-engineering", "baseToken": "<token>"}
{"type": "comment.unresolve", "markId": "<id>", "by": "ai:compound-engineering", "baseToken": "<token>"}
Suggest a replacement (pending — user must accept/reject):
{"type": "suggestion.add", "kind": "replace", "quote": "original text", "by": "ai:compound-engineering", "content": "replacement text", "baseToken": "<token>"}
Suggest and immediately apply (tracked but committed — user can reject to revert):
{"type": "suggestion.add", "kind": "replace", "quote": "original text", "by": "ai:compound-engineering", "content": "replacement text", "status": "accepted", "baseToken": "<token>"}
status: "accepted" creates the suggestion mark and commits the change in one call. The mark persists as an audit trail with per-edit attribution and a reject-to-revert affordance. Works with kind: "insert" | "delete" | "replace".
Accept or reject an existing suggestion:
{"type": "suggestion.accept", "markId": "<id>", "by": "ai:compound-engineering", "baseToken": "<token>"}
{"type": "suggestion.reject", "markId": "<id>", "by": "ai:compound-engineering", "baseToken": "<token>"}
suggestion.resolve is not supported — use accept or reject instead.
Whole-doc rewrite (last resort):
{"type": "rewrite.apply", "content": "full new markdown", "by": "ai:compound-engineering", "baseToken": "<token>"}
Prefer find_replace_in_doc or block-level /edit/v2 operations first. rewrite.apply is broad, disruptive, and blocked while live clients are connected.
Block-level edits via /edit/v2 (separate endpoint, separate shape):
curl -X POST "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/{slug}/edit/v2" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "x-share-token: <token>" \
-H "X-Agent-Id: ai:compound-engineering" \
-H "Idempotency-Key: <uuid>" \
-d '{
"by": "ai:compound-engineering",
"baseToken": "mt1:<token>",
"operations": [
{"op": "replace_block", "ref": "b3", "block": {"markdown": "Updated paragraph."}},
{"op": "insert_after", "ref": "b3", "blocks": [{"markdown": "## New section"}]}
]
}'
Per-op body shape (singular block vs plural blocks is load-bearing — sending the wrong one returns 422):
| op | body fields |
|---|---|
replace_block | ref, block: {markdown} |
insert_after | ref, blocks: [{markdown}, ...] |
insert_before | ref, blocks: [{markdown}, ...] |
delete_block | ref |
replace_range | fromRef, toRef, blocks: [{markdown}, ...] |
find_replace_in_block | ref, find, replace, occurrence: "first" | "all" |
find_replace_in_doc | find, replace, occurrence: "first" | "all", optional fromRef, toRef, block_filter |
Read /snapshot to get block ref IDs and mutationBase.token. ref values are opaque request tokens tied to the snapshot/baseToken; re-read /snapshot before follow-up block edits if writes have landed. operations commits atomically — either every op lands or none do — so one /edit/v2 call can batch dozens of block edits safely and efficiently. Successful full responses include the next mutationBase.token and fresh snapshot.blocks[].ref values for chaining.
For literal doc-wide sweeps, prefer find_replace_in_doc over many block replacements or a whole-doc rewrite. Validate large batches with ?dryRun=1 or ?validate=1; use ?return=minimal when you only need ok, revision, appliedCount, and the next mutationBase.
Editing while a client is connected is fine. /edit/v2, suggestion.add (including status: "accepted"), and all comment ops work during active collab. Only rewrite.apply is blocked by LIVE_CLIENTS_PRESENT — it would clobber in-flight Yjs edits.
When the loop breaks. If a mutation keeps failing after a fresh read and one retry, or state across reads looks inconsistent, call POST https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/bridge/report_bug with the failing request ID, slug, and raw response. The server enriches and files an issue.
/d/{slug}/bridge/*) require client version headers (x-proof-client-version, x-proof-client-build, x-proof-client-protocol) and return 426 CLIENT_UPGRADE_REQUIRED without them. Use /api/agent/{slug}/ops instead.Requires Proof.app running. Bridge at http://localhost:9847.
Required headers:
X-Agent-Id: ai:compound-engineering (identity for presence; keep aligned with by)Content-Type: application/jsonX-Window-Id: <uuid> (when multiple docs open)| Method | Endpoint | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /windows | List open documents |
| GET | /state | Read markdown, cursor, word count |
| GET | /marks | List all suggestions and comments |
| POST | /marks/suggest-replace | {"quote":"old","by":"ai:compound-engineering","content":"new"} |
| POST | /marks/suggest-insert | {"quote":"after this","by":"ai:compound-engineering","content":"insert"} |
| POST | /marks/suggest-delete | {"quote":"delete this","by":"ai:compound-engineering"} |
| POST | /marks/comment | {"quote":"text","by":"ai:compound-engineering","text":"comment"} |
| POST | /marks/reply | {"markId":"<id>","by":"ai:compound-engineering","text":"reply"} |
| POST | /marks/resolve | {"markId":"<id>","by":"ai:compound-engineering"} |
| POST | /marks/accept | {"markId":"<id>"} |
| POST | /marks/reject | {"markId":"<id>"} |
| POST | /rewrite | Last-resort whole-doc replacement: {"content":"full markdown","by":"ai:compound-engineering"} |
| POST | /presence | {"status":"reading","summary":"..."} |
| GET | /events/pending | Poll for user actions |
thinking, reading, idle, acting, waiting, completed
When given a Proof URL like https://www.proofeditor.ai/d/abc123?token=xxx:
abc123) and token from the URL/api/agent/{slug}/state when you need marks/mutation metadata/edit/v2 find_replace_in_doc or block operations; use /ops for comments, suggestions, and comment replies/resolutionSHARE_URL="https://www.proofeditor.ai/d/abc123?token=xxx"
curl -s -H "Accept: application/json" "$SHARE_URL"
curl -s -H "Accept: text/markdown" "$SHARE_URL"
# Read once for content + the initial baseToken.
# After each successful mutation, update BASE from the response's mutationBase.token.
STATE=$(curl -s "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/abc123/state" \
-H "x-share-token: xxx")
BASE=$(printf '%s' "$STATE" | jq -r '.mutationBase.token')
# Inspect doc fields as needed: printf '%s' "$STATE" | jq '.markdown, .revision'
# Comment
OP_RESP=$(curl -s -X POST "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/abc123/ops" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "x-share-token: xxx" \
-H "X-Agent-Id: ai:compound-engineering" \
-H "Idempotency-Key: $(uuidgen)" \
-d "$(jq -n --arg base "$BASE" '{type:"comment.add",quote:"text",by:"ai:compound-engineering",text:"comment",baseToken:$base}')")
NEXT_BASE=$(printf '%s' "$OP_RESP" | jq -r '.mutationBase.token // empty')
[ -n "$NEXT_BASE" ] && BASE="$NEXT_BASE"
# Suggest edit (tracked, pending)
OP_RESP=$(curl -s -X POST "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/abc123/ops" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "x-share-token: xxx" \
-H "X-Agent-Id: ai:compound-engineering" \
-H "Idempotency-Key: $(uuidgen)" \
-d "$(jq -n --arg base "$BASE" '{type:"suggestion.add",kind:"replace",quote:"old",by:"ai:compound-engineering",content:"new",baseToken:$base}')")
NEXT_BASE=$(printf '%s' "$OP_RESP" | jq -r '.mutationBase.token // empty')
[ -n "$NEXT_BASE" ] && BASE="$NEXT_BASE"
# Suggest and immediately apply (tracked, committed)
OP_RESP=$(curl -s -X POST "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/abc123/ops" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "x-share-token: xxx" \
-H "X-Agent-Id: ai:compound-engineering" \
-H "Idempotency-Key: $(uuidgen)" \
-d "$(jq -n --arg base "$BASE" '{type:"suggestion.add",kind:"replace",quote:"old",by:"ai:compound-engineering",content:"new",status:"accepted",baseToken:$base}')")
NEXT_BASE=$(printf '%s' "$OP_RESP" | jq -r '.mutationBase.token // empty')
[ -n "$NEXT_BASE" ] && BASE="$NEXT_BASE"
# Direct content edit (preferred when visible suggestion marks are not needed)
SNAPSHOT=$(curl -s "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/abc123/snapshot" \
-H "x-share-token: xxx")
EDIT_BASE=$(printf '%s' "$SNAPSHOT" | jq -r '.mutationBase.token')
curl -X POST "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/abc123/edit/v2?return=minimal" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "x-share-token: xxx" \
-H "X-Agent-Id: ai:compound-engineering" \
-H "Idempotency-Key: $(uuidgen)" \
-d "$(jq -n --arg base "$EDIT_BASE" '{by:"ai:compound-engineering",baseToken:$base,operations:[{op:"find_replace_in_doc",find:"old",replace:"new",occurrence:"all"}]}')"
Publishing a local file (the primary case): read the file and JSON-encode its full contents into the markdown field with jq --rawfile so newlines, quotes, and backticks are escaped correctly. Never hand-write the body or leave the inline placeholder — that publishes a placeholder doc instead of the source artifact (the plan, requirements, or ideation file the caller passed).
SRC="docs/plans/2026-05-04-001-feat-foo-plan.md" # source file from the caller
TITLE="Plan: Foo" # caller-provided title
# 1. Create — from a local source file:
RESPONSE=$(jq -n --arg title "$TITLE" --rawfile md "$SRC" '{title:$title, markdown:$md}' \
| curl -s -X POST https://www.proofeditor.ai/share/markdown \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" -d @-)
# (Ad-hoc inline content instead of a file:
# -d '{"title":"My Doc","markdown":"# Title\n\nContent here."}')
# 2. Extract URL and token
URL=$(echo "$RESPONSE" | jq -r '.tokenUrl')
SLUG=$(echo "$RESPONSE" | jq -r '.slug')
TOKEN=$(echo "$RESPONSE" | jq -r '.accessToken')
# 3. Bind display name via presence
curl -s -X POST "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/$SLUG/presence" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "x-share-token: $TOKEN" \
-H "X-Agent-Id: ai:compound-engineering" \
-d '{"name":"Compound Engineering","status":"reading","summary":"Uploaded doc"}'
# 4. Share the URL
echo "$URL"
# 5. Make comment/suggestion edits using the ops endpoint (baseToken required)
BASE=$(curl -s "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/$SLUG/state" \
-H "x-share-token: $TOKEN" | jq -r '.mutationBase.token')
OP_RESP=$(curl -s -X POST "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/$SLUG/ops" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "x-share-token: $TOKEN" \
-H "X-Agent-Id: ai:compound-engineering" \
-H "Idempotency-Key: $(uuidgen)" \
-d "$(jq -n --arg base "$BASE" '{type:"comment.add",quote:"Content here",by:"ai:compound-engineering",text:"Added a note",baseToken:$base}')")
NEXT_BASE=$(printf '%s' "$OP_RESP" | jq -r '.mutationBase.token // empty')
[ -n "$NEXT_BASE" ] && BASE="$NEXT_BASE"
# For content edits, prefer /edit/v2 over rewrite.apply.
SNAPSHOT=$(curl -s "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/$SLUG/snapshot" \
-H "x-share-token: $TOKEN")
EDIT_BASE=$(printf '%s' "$SNAPSHOT" | jq -r '.mutationBase.token')
curl -X POST "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/$SLUG/edit/v2?return=minimal" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "x-share-token: $TOKEN" \
-H "X-Agent-Id: ai:compound-engineering" \
-H "Idempotency-Key: $(uuidgen)" \
-d "$(jq -n --arg base "$EDIT_BASE" '{by:"ai:compound-engineering",baseToken:$base,operations:[{op:"find_replace_in_doc",find:"Content",replace:"Updated content",occurrence:"all"}]}')"
Sync the current Proof doc state to a local markdown file. Used for:
SLUG=<slug>
TOKEN=<accessToken>
LOCAL=<absolute-path>
# One read to a temp file — avoids passing markdown through $(...), which would strip trailing newlines.
STATE_TMP=$(mktemp)
curl -s "https://www.proofeditor.ai/api/agent/$SLUG/state" \
-H "x-share-token: $TOKEN" > "$STATE_TMP"
REVISION=$(jq -r '.revision' "$STATE_TMP")
# Atomic write: stream .markdown bytes directly to a temp sibling, then rename.
TMP="${LOCAL}.proof-sync.$$"
jq -jr '.markdown' "$STATE_TMP" > "$TMP" && mv "$TMP" "$LOCAL"
rm "$STATE_TMP"
jq -jr (-j no trailing newline, -r raw string) streams the markdown bytes straight to the temp file without going through a shell variable, so trailing newlines survive intact. mv within the same filesystem is atomic — a crashed write leaves the original untouched rather than a half-written file.
Confirm before writing when the pull isn't directly asked for. If a workflow ends up pulling as a side-effect of a different action, surface the impending write with a short confirm like "Sync Proof doc to <localPath>?" A silent overwrite is surprising — the user may have forgotten the local file exists in that session, or expected Proof to stay canonical until they explicitly asked to pull.
/state content as source of truth before editingedit/v2 (direct block changes) or suggestion.add (tracked changes); reserve rewrite.apply for no-client scenarios since it's blocked by LIVE_CLIENTS_PRESENT when anyone is connectedfind_replace_in_doc and block-level /edit/v2 edits before considering rewrite.applyby: "ai:compound-engineering" on every op and X-Agent-Id: ai:compound-engineering in headers for consistent attributionbaseToken from your most recent /state or /snapshot read; on STALE_BASE, re-read and retry oncenpx claudepluginhub everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin --plugin compound-engineeringCreate, edit with comments/suggestions/rewrites, and share collaborative markdown documents via Proof web API or macOS local bridge.
Syncs, pushes, and pulls markdown docs with Glyphdown's CRDT-based collaboration platform. Use for editing shared docs, leaving suggestions, or managing a cloned workspace.
Guides users through a structured three-stage workflow for co-authoring documentation: context gathering, iterative refinement, and reader testing.