Prerequisites
Before using this skill, ensure you have:
- Access to the AI model or dataset requiring validation
- Model predictions or training data available for analysis
- Understanding of demographic attributes relevant to fairness evaluation
- Python environment with fairness assessment libraries (e.g., Fairlearn, AIF360)
- Appropriate permissions to analyze sensitive data attributes
Instructions
Step 1: Identify Validation Scope
Determine which aspects of the AI system require ethical validation:
- Model predictions across demographic groups
- Training dataset representation and balance
- Feature selection and potential proxy variables
- Output disparities and fairness metrics
Step 2: Analyze for Bias
Use the skill to examine the AI system:
- Load model predictions or dataset using Read tool
- Identify sensitive attributes (age, gender, race, etc.)
- Calculate fairness metrics (demographic parity, equalized odds, etc.)
- Detect statistical disparities across groups
Step 3: Generate Validation Report
The skill produces a comprehensive report including:
- Identified biases and their severity
- Fairness metric calculations with thresholds
- Representation analysis across demographic groups
- Recommended mitigation strategies
- Compliance assessment against ethical guidelines
Step 4: Implement Mitigations
Based on findings, apply recommended strategies:
- Rebalance training data using sampling techniques
- Apply algorithmic fairness constraints during training
- Adjust decision thresholds for specific groups
- Document ethical considerations and trade-offs
Output
The skill generates structured reports containing:
Bias Detection Results
- Statistical disparities identified across groups
- Severity classification (low, medium, high, critical)
- Affected demographic segments with quantified impact
Fairness Metrics
- Demographic parity ratios
- Equal opportunity differences
- Predictive parity measurements
- Calibration scores across groups
Mitigation Recommendations
- Specific technical approaches to reduce bias
- Data augmentation or resampling strategies
- Model constraint adjustments
- Monitoring and continuous evaluation plans
Compliance Assessment
- Alignment with ethical AI guidelines
- Regulatory compliance status
- Documentation requirements for audit trails
Error Handling
Common issues and solutions:
Insufficient Data
- Error: Cannot calculate fairness metrics with small sample sizes
- Solution: Aggregate related groups or collect additional data for underrepresented segments
Missing Sensitive Attributes
- Error: Demographic information not available in dataset
- Solution: Use proxy detection methods or request access to protected attributes under appropriate governance
Conflicting Fairness Criteria
- Error: Multiple fairness metrics show contradictory results
- Solution: Document trade-offs and prioritize metrics based on use case context and stakeholder input
Data Quality Issues
- Error: Inconsistent or corrupted attribute values
- Solution: Perform data cleaning, standardization, and validation before bias analysis
Resources
Fairness Assessment Frameworks
- Fairlearn library for bias detection and mitigation
- AI Fairness 360 (AIF360) toolkit for comprehensive fairness analysis
- Google What-If Tool for interactive fairness exploration
Ethical AI Guidelines
- IEEE Ethically Aligned Design principles
- EU Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI
- ACM Code of Ethics for AI practitioners
Fairness Metrics Documentation
- Demographic parity and statistical parity definitions
- Equalized odds and equal opportunity metrics
- Individual fairness and calibration measures
Best Practices
- Involve diverse stakeholders in fairness criteria selection
- Document all ethical decisions and trade-offs
- Implement continuous monitoring for fairness drift
- Maintain transparency in model limitations and biases