name: competitive-intelligence description: | Competitive intelligence skill for analyzing competitive landscape, creating battlecards, and tracking competitor movements.

trigger: |

Competitive analysis needed
Battlecard creation required
User requests "competitive intel" or "competitor analysis"

skip_when: |

Pure market sizing → use market-analysis
Positioning work → use positioning-development (includes competitive)
Already have current competitive intel

Competitive Intelligence

Comprehensive competitive analysis including landscape mapping, battlecards, and ongoing tracking.

Purpose

Competitive intelligence informs strategic decisions:

Positioning requires understanding competitive alternatives
Messaging requires competitive differentiation
Sales requires battlecards for objection handling
Strategy requires tracking competitor movements

Competitive intel should be refreshed regularly, not one-time.

Process

Phase 1: Competitive Landscape

Map the competitive ecosystem:

## Competitive Landscape

### Competitor Categories
| Category | Definition | Examples |
|----------|------------|----------|
| Direct | Same product category, same buyer | [Competitors] |
| Indirect | Different product, same problem | [Alternatives] |
| Potential | Could enter market | [Threats] |

### Competitor Profiles

#### [Competitor 1 Name]
**Overview:**
- Company: [Description]
- Founded: [Year]
- Funding: [Amount/Stage]
- Size: [Employees, Revenue if known]
- HQ: [Location]

**Product:**
- Core offering: [Description]
- Key features: [List]
- Technology: [Stack if known]
- Integrations: [Key integrations]

**Market Position:**
- Target segment: [Who they target]
- Positioning: [How they position]
- Pricing: [Model and price points]
- Market share: [Estimate if available]

**Strengths:**
1. [Strength 1]
2. [Strength 2]
3. [Strength 3]

**Weaknesses:**
1. [Weakness 1]
2. [Weakness 2]
3. [Weakness 3]

**Recent Activity:**
- [Date]: [Activity/announcement]
- [Date]: [Activity/announcement]

#### [Competitor 2 Name]
[Repeat structure]

Phase 2: Feature Comparison

Detailed feature analysis:

## Feature Comparison

### Feature Matrix
| Feature Category | Feature | Us | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C |
|-----------------|---------|-----|--------|--------|--------|
| [Category 1] | [Feature 1] | YES/NO/PARTIAL | ... | ... | ... |
| | [Feature 2] | YES/NO/PARTIAL | ... | ... | ... |
| [Category 2] | [Feature 3] | YES/NO/PARTIAL | ... | ... | ... |
| | [Feature 4] | YES/NO/PARTIAL | ... | ... | ... |

### Legend
- YES: Full feature parity or better
- PARTIAL: Feature exists but limited
- NO: Feature not available
- SUPERIOR: Feature advantage over competitors

### Unique Features
**Our Unique Features:**
| Feature | Competitive Advantage | Customer Value |
|---------|----------------------|----------------|
| [Feature 1] | [Why unique] | [Why customers care] |
| [Feature 2] | [Why unique] | [Why customers care] |

**Competitor Unique Features:**
| Competitor | Feature | Threat Level | Our Response |
|------------|---------|--------------|--------------|
| [Comp A] | [Feature] | HIGH/MED/LOW | [How we counter] |
| [Comp B] | [Feature] | HIGH/MED/LOW | [How we counter] |

Phase 3: Win/Loss Analysis

Understand competitive dynamics:

## Win/Loss Analysis

### Win Scenarios
| Scenario | Why We Win | Key Proof Points |
|----------|------------|------------------|
| [Scenario 1] | [Reasons] | [Evidence] |
| [Scenario 2] | [Reasons] | [Evidence] |
| [Scenario 3] | [Reasons] | [Evidence] |

### Loss Scenarios
| Scenario | Why We Lose | Improvement Needed |
|----------|-------------|-------------------|
| [Scenario 1] | [Reasons] | [Gap to address] |
| [Scenario 2] | [Reasons] | [Gap to address] |
| [Scenario 3] | [Reasons] | [Gap to address] |

### Head-to-Head Analysis
| Competitor | Win Rate | Common Win Reasons | Common Loss Reasons |
|------------|----------|-------------------|---------------------|
| [Comp A] | X% | [Reasons] | [Reasons] |
| [Comp B] | X% | [Reasons] | [Reasons] |
| [Comp C] | X% | [Reasons] | [Reasons] |

### Competitive Triggers
**When to Engage:**
- [Signal that indicates opportunity]
- [Signal that indicates opportunity]

**When to Walk Away:**
- [Signal that indicates poor fit]
- [Signal that indicates poor fit]

Phase 4: Battlecards

Create sales enablement:

## Battlecards

### Battlecard: [Competitor Name]

**Quick Facts**
| Attribute | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| Company | [Name] |
| HQ | [Location] |
| Founded | [Year] |
| Funding | [Amount] |
| Employees | [Count] |
| Pricing | [Range] |

**Their Positioning**
> "[Their tagline or positioning statement]"

**Their Strengths (What They'll Say)**
1. [Strength 1]
2. [Strength 2]
3. [Strength 3]

**Their Weaknesses (What They Won't Say)**
1. [Weakness 1]
2. [Weakness 2]
3. [Weakness 3]

**Why Customers Choose Them**
- [Reason 1]
- [Reason 2]

**Why Customers Choose Us Instead**
- [Reason 1]
- [Reason 2]

**Objection Handling**
| Their Claim | Our Response | Proof Point |
|-------------|--------------|-------------|
| "[Claim 1]" | [Response] | [Evidence] |
| "[Claim 2]" | [Response] | [Evidence] |
| "[Claim 3]" | [Response] | [Evidence] |

**Landmines to Set**
- Question to ask: "[Question that exposes their weakness]"
- Question to ask: "[Question that highlights our strength]"

**Trap Questions They'll Set**
- "[Question]" → Our response: "[How to handle]"
- "[Question]" → Our response: "[How to handle]"

**Win Strategy**
1. [First step]
2. [Second step]
3. [Close approach]

[Repeat for each major competitor]

Phase 5: Tracking and Updates

Establish ongoing intelligence:

## Competitive Tracking

### Monitoring Sources
| Source | Type | Frequency | Owner |
|--------|------|-----------|-------|
| [Source 1] | News/Social/Product | Daily/Weekly | [Owner] |
| [Source 2] | News/Social/Product | Daily/Weekly | [Owner] |
| [Source 3] | News/Social/Product | Daily/Weekly | [Owner] |

### Alert Triggers
| Trigger | Action | Owner |
|---------|--------|-------|
| New funding announcement | Update battlecard, assess threat | [Owner] |
| Major feature launch | Feature comparison update | [Owner] |
| Pricing change | Pricing analysis update | [Owner] |
| Key hire/departure | Profile update | [Owner] |
| Acquisition/partnership | Strategy reassessment | [Owner] |

### Update Cadence
| Deliverable | Frequency | Owner |
|-------------|-----------|-------|
| Battlecard refresh | Monthly | [Owner] |
| Feature matrix update | Quarterly | [Owner] |
| Full competitive review | Bi-annually | [Owner] |
| Ad-hoc alerts | As needed | [Owner] |

### Intelligence Gaps
| Gap | Impact | Plan to Address |
|-----|--------|-----------------|
| [Gap 1] | HIGH/MED/LOW | [How to fill] |
| [Gap 2] | HIGH/MED/LOW | [How to fill] |

Output Format

# Competitive Intelligence: [Market/Product]

## Executive Summary
- **Primary Competitors:** [Top 3]
- **Competitive Position:** [Strong/Moderate/Weak]
- **Key Differentiator:** [Primary advantage]
- **Biggest Threat:** [Primary concern]

## Competitive Landscape
[Phase 1 output]

## Feature Comparison
[Phase 2 output]

## Win/Loss Analysis
[Phase 3 output]

## Battlecards
[Phase 4 output]

## Tracking Plan
[Phase 5 output]

## Recommendations
1. **Positioning Implications:** [What this means for positioning]
2. **Product Gaps:** [Features to prioritize]
3. **Sales Enablement:** [Training/tools needed]
4. **Watch List:** [Competitors to monitor closely]

## Last Updated
- **Date:** [Date]
- **Owner:** [Name]
- **Next Review:** [Date]

Blocker Criteria

Blocker	Action
No competitor data available	STOP. Cannot analyze without data. Research required.
Competitor set unclear	STOP. Define competitive frame before analysis.
Data significantly outdated	STOP. Refresh data before proceeding.
Conflicting competitive claims	STOP. Verify with multiple sources.

Anti-Rationalization Table

See shared-patterns/anti-rationalization.md for universal anti-rationalizations.

Gate-Specific Anti-Rationalizations

Rationalization	Why It's WRONG	Required Action
"We don't have competitors"	Every product has alternatives, including doing nothing	Identify all alternatives
"We know our competitors"	Assumptions miss updates and nuance	Systematic analysis required
"Battlecards are just for sales"	Competitive intel informs all GTM	Create comprehensive intel
"Competition is irrelevant"	Market context always matters	Analyze regardless of lead

Pressure Resistance

See shared-patterns/pressure-resistance.md for universal pressure scenarios.

Gate-Specific Pressures

Pressure Type	Request	Agent Response
"Quick competitive scan"	"Just list competitors"	"Lists without analysis miss insights. Completing full analysis."
"Focus on weak competitors"	"Only analyze ones we beat"	"Strong competitors inform strategy. Analyzing all."
"Skip the battlecards"	"Sales can figure it out"	"Sales enablement drives wins. Creating battlecards."

Execution Report

Base metrics per shared-patterns/execution-report.md:

Metric	Value
Duration	Xm Ys
Iterations	N
Result	PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL

Gate-Specific Details

competitors_profiled: N
features_compared: N
battlecards_created: N
sources_referenced: N
intelligence_gaps: N
update_cadence_defined: YES/NO

competitive-intelligence