name: competitive-visual-audit description: Provides competitive visual audit frameworks and templates for brand identity work. Auto-activates during visual direction, color selection, typography selection, and positioning work. Use when discussing competitors, competitive audit, differentiation, white space, perceptual mapping, visual landscape, zig zag strategy, brand audit, color audit, typography audit, visual identity analysis, or positioning maps.

Competitive Visual Audit Frameworks

Quick reference for competitive brand analysis that informs visual identity decisions. This skill auto-activates during visual phases to ensure competitive insights guide design decisions.

"When others zig, zag. Radical differentiation is the surest path to relevance." — Marty Neumeier

Key Statistics

55% of brand first impressions are visual
90% of snap judgments are made on color alone (depending on product)
80% boost in brand recognition from consistent visual strategy
86% of customers say authenticity is a key reason they buy

The Good/Different Chart (Marty Neumeier)

Plot brands on two axes — "Good" (customer value) and "Different" (novelty/surprise):

                DIFFERENT (Novel, Surprising)
                       │
      ZONE OF          │         ZONE OF
      IRRELEVANCE      │         DOMINANCE
      (Different but   │         (Good AND Different)
       not good)       │         ← THE GOAL
                       │
───────────────────────┼───────────────────────
                       │
      ZONE OF          │         ZONE OF
      MEDIOCRITY       │         COMMODITIZATION
      (Neither good    │         (Good but
       nor different)  │          not different)
                       │
                GOOD (Customer Value)

Score each competitor 1-10 on both axes, then plot their position.

The Only-ness Statement (Marty Neumeier)

Format: "Our brand is the only [category] that [differentiation] for [audience] in [market] who [need or belief]."

Test: Can competitors complete the same statement truthfully? If yes, you're not differentiated enough.

Zig vs Zag Decision Framework

When to "Zig" (Follow Category Conventions)

Category requires trust/safety signals (healthcare, finance, legal)
Customers use visual conventions to identify legitimate options
Entering an established market needing initial credibility
Differentiation comes from other factors (service, pricing)

When to "Zag" (Break Category Conventions)

Category is visually homogeneous (everyone looks the same)
Genuine philosophical/strategic difference to communicate
Target audience is tired of category sameness
Can sustain the difference with real substance
Willing to polarize some to attract others strongly

Visual Differentiation Priority

Based on impact and feasibility:

Priority	Element	Impact	Notes
1	Color	Highest	Most immediate differentiator
2	Typography	High	Affects all touchpoints
3	Photography/Imagery	High	Distinctive but resource-intensive
4	Illustration style	High	Unique but requires consistency
5	Logo design	Foundational	Sets tone, just one element
6	Layout/White space	Subtle	Differentiates through feel

Quick Visual Audit Checklist

When analyzing competitors, capture for each:

Visual Identity

Logo: Symbol vs. wordmark, style, complexity
Primary Color + Hex code
Secondary Colors
Typography: Serif vs. sans-serif, weights
Imagery: Photography vs. illustration, mood, subjects
Overall aesthetic: Minimal, bold, playful, corporate

Positioning

Tagline
Key claims
Only-ness assessment (can they complete the statement?)
Good/Different Chart position (1-10 each axis)

Voice

Tone: Professional, casual, playful, authoritative
Personality traits (3-4 adjectives)
Sample language from their site

Perceptual Mapping Quick Guide

Choose Two Axes that matter to customers and create contrast:
- Price (Low → High) vs. Quality (Low → High)
- Professional ↔ Friendly
- Traditional ↔ Innovative
- For Experts ↔ For Everyone
Plot 10+ competitors on the map
Identify White Space — quadrants with low competition

Common Visual Patterns to Look For

Color Clusters

Where do most competitors congregate? (Many industries have a "blue problem")
What color territories are unclaimed?

Typography Trends

All serif? → Consider sans-serif
All geometric sans? → Consider humanist or serif

Imagery Patterns

All stock photography? → Consider custom illustration
All people shots? → Consider product/abstract

Research-to-Design Bridge

Competitive Finding	Informs
Color white space	Primary color selection
Typography patterns	Typeface selection
Imagery gaps	Photography/illustration direction
Positioning map white space	Visual personality
Archetype landscape	Overall aesthetic

Templates

See reference/templates.md for:

Color Audit Matrix
Typography Audit Matrix
Imagery Style Audit Matrix
Perceptual Map Template
Good/Different Chart Template
Output Validation Checklist

When to Apply This Knowledge

During Color Selection

Reference competitive color audit to avoid clusters
Identify unclaimed color territories

During Typography Selection

Reference typography audit to find differentiation
Counter-position if category is homogeneous

During Visual Direction

Use perceptual map to guide overall aesthetic
Apply Zig vs Zag decision framework

During Positioning Work

Reference Only-ness Statement opportunities
Use Good/Different Chart for strategic positioning

Key Principles

Map before you create — Understand the landscape before making visual decisions
White space is opportunity — What no one does is what you could own
Color is fastest differentiator — Start there for visual differentiation
Distinctiveness requires consistency — Different only works if you maintain it
Be the Only, not the Best — Neumeier's core principle

Deep Methodology

For comprehensive competitive brand audits, the brand-competitive-auditor agent contains 750+ lines of expert methodology including detailed output formats and research processes.

competitive-visual-audit