Review and Refine Beads Issues

You are tasked with thoroughly reviewing, proofreading, and polishing the filed Beads epics and issues to ensure workers have a smooth implementation experience.

Step 1: Load Current Issues

First, get the current state:

bd list --json
bd ready --json

If specific IDs were provided ($ARGUMENTS), focus on those. Otherwise, review all issues.

Step 2: Systematic Review Checklist

For EACH issue, verify:

Clarity

• Title is action-oriented and specific
• Description is clear and unambiguous
• A developer unfamiliar with the codebase could understand the task
• No jargon without explanation

Completeness

• Acceptance criteria are defined and testable
• Technical implementation hints are provided where helpful
• Relevant file paths or modules are mentioned
• Edge cases and error handling are considered

Dependencies

• All blocking dependencies are linked
• No circular dependencies exist
• Dependencies are minimal (not over-constrained)
• Ready issues exist for parallel work

Scope

• Issue is appropriately sized (not too large)
• Large issues are broken into subtasks
• No duplicate or overlapping issues

Priority

• Priority reflects actual importance
• Critical path items are prioritized correctly
• Dependencies and priorities align

Step 3: Common Issues to Fix

Watch for and correct:

1. Vague titles: "Fix bug" -> "Fix null pointer in UserService.getProfile when user not found"
2. Missing context: Add relevant file paths, function names, or module references
3. Implicit knowledge: Make assumptions explicit
4. Missing acceptance criteria: Add "Done when..." statements
5. Over-coupling: Break dependencies that aren't strictly necessary
6. Under-specified: Add technical notes for complex tasks
7. Duplicate work: Merge or link related issues
8. Missing dependencies: Link issues that should be sequenced
9. Wrong priorities: Adjust based on critical path analysis
10. Typos and grammar: Fix for professionalism

Step 4: Update Issues

Use bd update to fix issues:

bd update <id> --title "Improved title" --json
bd update <id> --priority <new-priority> --json
bd update <id> --description "New description" --json
bd update <id> --acceptance "Acceptance criteria" --json

Manage dependencies separately with bd dep:

bd dep add <issue-id> <dependency-id> --json   # Add dependency
bd dep remove <issue-id> <dependency-id> --json # Remove dependency
bd dep tree <issue-id> --json                   # View dependency tree
bd dep cycles --json                            # Check for circular deps

For major rewrites, close and recreate:

bd close <id> --reason "Replaced by <new-id>" --json
bd create "Better title" -t <type> -p <priority> --deps <dep-id> --json

Step 5: Dependency Graph Validation

After refinements, validate:

bd list --json                    # View all issues
bd list --status open --json      # View only open issues
bd ready --json                   # View unblocked issues ready for work
bd dep cycles --json              # Check for circular dependencies
bd dep tree <epic-id> --json      # View dependency tree for an epic

Check:

• No orphaned issues (except entry points)
• No circular dependencies
• Critical path is clear
• Parallelization opportunities are preserved

Step 6: Final Quality Gate

Before completing, ensure:

1. Readability: Any developer can pick up any ready issue
2. Traceability: Issues link to epics, epics link to the plan
3. Testability: Each issue has clear "done" criteria
4. Parallelism: Multiple issues can be worked simultaneously
5. Completeness: No gaps in the plan coverage

Output Format

Provide a review report:

Summary

• Total issues reviewed: X
• Issues updated: Y
• Issues created: Z
• Issues closed/merged: W

Changes Made

• List significant updates with rationale

Remaining Concerns

• Any issues that need user input
• Ambiguities that couldn't be resolved

Ready for Implementation

• List of ready issues workers can start with
• Suggested execution order for optimal flow

Iteration Tracking

You may iterate on refinements up to 5 times if asked. Track iterations:

• Iteration 1: Initial review pass
• Iteration 2-5: Deeper refinements based on feedback

After 5 iterations, respond: "I don't think we can do much better than this. The issues are thoroughly reviewed, well-documented, and ready for workers to implement."