From aidd-dev
Read-only review of a diff (PR or working changes) for code quality against project rules and feature behavior against plan acceptance criteria. Surfaces findings with a verdict; never patches.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/aidd-dev:05-reviewopusreviewerThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Read-only review of a diff (a PR or working changes): code quality against project rules, and feature behavior against the plan's acceptance criteria. It surfaces findings and a verdict; it never edits code. The fix hands off to the act-skills (`07-refactor` for code, `02-implement` / `08-debug` for behavior gaps). Diff-scoped - for a whole-codebase read-only diagnosis use `aidd-dev:04-audit` i...
Read-only review of a diff (a PR or working changes): code quality against project rules, and feature behavior against the plan's acceptance criteria. It surfaces findings and a verdict; it never edits code. The fix hands off to the act-skills (07-refactor for code, 02-implement / 08-debug for behavior gaps). Diff-scoped - for a whole-codebase read-only diagnosis use aidd-dev:04-audit instead.
Spawn the reviewer agent to execute this skill. For tools that do not support context: fork frontmatter: invoke the reviewer agent explicitly with this skill's content as the prompt.
| # | Action | When to use |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | review-code | Quality review of a diff against project rules and clean-code principles |
| 02 | review-functional | Verify the diff matches the plan's acceptance criteria, flows, edge cases |
Pick the ONE action matching the user's intent; do NOT default to action 01.
01-review-code02-review-functionalIf the intent is ambiguous, ask one clarifying question before picking. Then read and follow only the matching action file.
@actions/01-review-code.md@actions/02-review-functional.mdnpx claudepluginhub ai-driven-dev/framework --plugin aidd-devReviews code changes, diffs, or PRs for correctness, edge cases, naming clarity, test gaps, and conventions from .context/CONVENTIONS.md.
Reviews pull requests and diffs to find unrelated changes, missing verification, behavior risks, and over-engineering. Intended for code review audits of human or AI-generated code.
Reviews diffs and PRs for bugs, security issues, mocks, and placeholders. Useful for pre-commit code review or auditing agent output.