From GTM Skills
Score and prioritize prospects using buying signals like hiring, funding, tech changes, and executive moves. Use for lead scoring, intent detection, and prioritization.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/gtm-skills:signal-scoringThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Most prospects aren't ready to buy. Signals separate the ones who are from the
Most prospects aren't ready to buy. Signals separate the ones who are from the ones who might be someday. A signal-anchored outreach program consistently outperforms list-blast approaches — triggers beat blasts every time.
This skill builds a configurable signal scoring system. You define which signals matter for your business, assign weights, and produce tiered lead lists that tell your team exactly who to contact first and why.
Signal-based selling as practiced by ColdIQ and Explorium demonstrates that trigger-anchored outreach achieves 2-3x higher reply rates than generic cold email. The core principle: reach out when something changed, not when you decided to run a campaign.
The priority rule is recency + specificity. A website pricing page visit from yesterday beats a Bombora intent surge from last week. The signal with the clearest, most recent tie to purchase intent leads the outreach.
For phone-led outbound, layer Joey Gilkey Phone Intent on top of buying signals — reachability is a separate dimension from purchase intent. High intent
references/joey-gilkey-bucketing.mdChoose from four categories. Assign weights based on what correlates with closed-won deals in your sales data:
| Signal Category | Example Signals | Default Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Hiring | Job postings for roles your product supports, team expansion, new leadership | 0-25 pts |
| Funding | Recent round closed, new investor, funding amount | 0-20 pts |
| Tech Stack | Added complementary tool, removed competitor, new technology adoption | 0-25 pts |
| Intent | Website visits, content downloads, search behavior, review site activity | 0-30 pts |
Total possible: 100 points. Adjust weights based on your sales data — weight the signals that correlate with closed-won.
For each signal category, set up detection sources:
For each target account:
Priority rule for multiple signals: score only the single most relevant signal per account. Recency + specificity determines which signal leads.
| Tier | Score Range | Action | SLA |
|---|---|---|---|
| A — Hot | 80-100 | Immediate personalized outreach. Multi-thread. | Within 24 hours |
| B — Warm | 60-79 | Enroll in sequence. Monitor for new signals. | Within 3 days |
| C — Cool | 40-59 | Nurture track. Re-score in 30 days. | Nurture drip |
| Discard | <40 | Not yet. Re-evaluate quarterly. | No action |
Scored account list with signal breakdown:
Account: Acme Corp
Total Signal Score: 85 (Tier A — Hot)
Signals detected:
- Hiring: 3 new SDR roles posted this week (20 pts)
- Funding: Series B closed last month, $25M (15 pts)
- Tech Stack: Added Salesforce last quarter (15 pts)
- Intent: Visited pricing page 3x this week (25 pts)
- ICP fit bonus: Exact match on industry + size (10 pts)
Recommended action: Outreach within 24 hours. Lead with hiring signal.
Suggested angle: "Saw you're scaling the SDR team — most teams at your
stage struggle with ramp time. We helped [similar company] cut it by 40%."
Acting on too many signals per account. A company showing 5 signals doesn't mean send 5 different emails. Pick one — the most recent and specific — and lead with it.
Weights not calibrated to your data. Default weights are a starting point. Review quarterly against your closed-won deals and adjust.
Stale signals. A funding round from 6 months ago is no longer a trigger. Signal freshness matters. Set expiration windows.
No action on signals. A signal without an immediate, automated action is just noise. Every detection should trigger a workflow.
Equal-weight scoring. Not all signals are equal. A company hiring for a role your product directly supports is worth more than a generic intent signal. Weight accordingly.
references/framework-notes.md — Named frameworks and reference tablestemplates/output-template.md — Deliverable shell for agent outputscripts/check-output.py — Lightweight deliverable validatorreferences/joey-gilkey-bucketing.md — Phone Intent scoring layer (repo root)references/cold-calling-experts-index.md — Phone vs email signal router (repo root)npx claudepluginhub leadmagic/gtm-skillsBuilds a two-score lead scoring model in HubSpot (Fit + Engagement) using the new Lead Scoring tool. Replaces deprecated HubSpot Score property and migrates references.
Activate for: lead score, score this lead, qualify, qualification, lead quality, ICP match, fit score, should we pursue, is this a good lead, lead tier, hot lead, warm lead, MQL, SQL, prioritise leads, lead ranking, lead rating, account score. NOT for: prospect research (use prospect-research), CRM enrichment (use crm-enrichment), outreach drafting (use outreach), pipeline forecasting (use pipeline).
Scores and tiers ICP-fit accounts across firmographic, technographic, behavioral, and intent dimensions. Produces weighted scorecards, tiering rules, anti-ICP exclusions, and buying committee maps.